M. Edelmann

44 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

M. Edelmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Microbiology 12
  • Sensory Systems 23
  • Pharmacology 53
  • Oncology 80
  • Condensed Matter Physics 36
Replace Kayo Inoue with:
Kayo Inoue Japan
Yotsuo Higashi Japan
S Kishimoto Japan
Huichun Liu China
Chengcheng Ji China
Akihiro Kojima Japan
M. Makiuchi Japan
Tomoyuki Wada Japan
Fukun Liu China
Yansheng Jiang Belgium
M. Edelmann relative to Kayo Inoue Japan Kayo Inoue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Kayo Inoue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Edelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Edelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Edelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Edelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Edelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Edelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Edelmann. The network helps show where M. Edelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Edelmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Edelmann Line = papers co-authored together M. Edelmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A comparison of long term results of the standard Whipple procedure and the pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.
199465
2 200051
3 200940
4 200928
5
[Sprain of the cervical spine: early functional vs. immobilization treatment].
199721
6 201721
7 202018
8 201316
9 200816
10 200316
11 201614
12 198714
13 198712
14 19759
15 20158
16 19778
17 20056
18 19856
19 19825
20 19825

About M. Edelmann

M. Edelmann is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (11 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (7 papers), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (6 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Laser Design and Applications (2 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (12 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations), Pharmacology (53 citations), Oncology (80 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (36 citations). M. Edelmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf M. Huber, W. Kozuschek, Michael J. Sanderson, Giorgio Sangiovanni, Robert Ferrari, Albrecht Bergner, G. Giebel, Fernando Gamarra, W. Cullmann and Luca de’ Medici. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Nuclear Energy, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology and Respiration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact