M. E. Newton

640 citations
43 papers · 498 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 29
    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 3
    • Plant Pathogens and Resistance 3
    • Bryophyte Studies and Records 30
    • Lichen and fungal ecology 25
    • Fern and Epiphyte Biology 3
    • Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 3

M. E. Newton

38 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

M. E. Newton
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 308
  • Plant Science 342
  • Insect Science 85
  • Genetics 58
  • Ecology 55
Replace P. H. Gouyon with:
P. H. Gouyon France
P. A. van der Laan Netherlands
David Carmean Canada
C. P. Brookes United Kingdom
J. W. Brewer United States
Dorothy E. Shaw Australia
J. W. Boyes Canada
Bertrand Dommée France
Ching‐Wen Tan Taiwan
L. E. Caltagirone United States
M. E. Newton relative to P. H. Gouyon France P. H. Gouyon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
P. H. Gouyon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Newton. The network helps show where M. E. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Newton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. E. Newton Line = papers co-authored together M. E. Newton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197457
2 196854
3 197651
4 197626
5 197125
6 197824
7 198620
8 197319
9 198117
10 197716
11 200315
12 198514
13 196814
14 196613
15 198711
16 196710
17 19759
18 19869
19 19787
20 19777

About M. E. Newton

M. E. Newton is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (30 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (29 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (25 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (3 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (3 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (308 citations), Plant Science (342 citations), Insect Science (85 citations), Genetics (58 citations) and Ecology (55 citations). M. E. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Wood, D. I. Southern, A. J. E. Smith, Andrew J. Wallace, S. W. Greene, G. C. S. Clarke, Brett A. Summerell, Keith L. McDougall, Jean A. Paton and H. L. K. Whitehouse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bryology, Chromosoma, The Bryologist, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society and Genetica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact