M. Duke

507 citations
32 papers · 364 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. Duke

29 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

M. Duke
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Reproductive Medicine 107
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 119
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 164
  • Gender Studies 20
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 10
Replace Sonia Brahem with:
Sonia Brahem Tunisia
L. Ribustello United States
M. Dumont France
Alessandra Parrella United States
M.E. Enginsu Netherlands
Adrienne Reing United States
Yi-Yi Tsai Taiwan
Dominique Bouret France
Tammie K. Roy United Kingdom
P. Braeckmans Belgium
M. Duke relative to Sonia Brahem Tunisia Sonia Brahem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sonia Brahem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Duke. The network helps show where M. Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Duke Line = papers co-authored together M. Duke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200672
2 200750
3 201846
4 201142
5 201642
6 200638
7 201526
8 196814
9 20237
10 20053
11 20072
12 20182
13 20032
14 20182
15 20072
16 20121
17 20031
18 20051
19 20171
20 20051

About M. Duke

M. Duke is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics and Gender Studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (14 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (11 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (4 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (107 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (119 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (164 citations), Gender Studies (20 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (10 citations). M. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Alan B. Copperman, B. Sandler, Martha Luna, L. Grunfeld, J. Barritt, Tanmoy Mukherjee, J. Rodriguez-Purata, Joseph Lee, D. Ezcurra and Jane Ruman. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Poultry Science and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact