M. D. Stoneham

576 citations
14 papers · 433 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

M. D. Stoneham

14 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

M. D. Stoneham
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 159
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 41
  • Emergency Medicine 50
  • Surgery 147
  • Developmental Neuroscience 12
Replace Ferdi Menda with:
Ferdi Menda Türkiye
K. Stutz Switzerland
Mehmet Tuğrul Türkiye
Eliana Marisa Ganem Brazil
M. Vucevic United Kingdom
Thomas J. Conahan United States
Thalia M. Martin United States
Michael Zagnoev United States
Rolf Buhl Germany
D. R. Schroeder United States
M. D. Stoneham relative to Ferdi Menda Türkiye Ferdi Menda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ferdi Menda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. D. Stoneham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. D. Stoneham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. D. Stoneham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. D. Stoneham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. D. Stoneham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. D. Stoneham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. D. Stoneham. The network helps show where M. D. Stoneham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside M. D. Stoneham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. D. Stoneham Line = papers co-authored together M. D. Stoneham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1996104
2 199667
3 199559
4 199347
5 199746
6 199224
7 199622
8 199521
9 201517
10 199511
11
Anaesthesia and resuscitation at altitude.
19956
12 19974
13 19973
14 19972

About M. D. Stoneham

M. D. Stoneham is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (2 papers) and Blood transfusion and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (159 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (41 citations), Emergency Medicine (50 citations), Surgery (147 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (12 citations). M. D. Stoneham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. J. M. Walters, R. Cooper, Nial Quiney, J. Robert Sneyd and Justin Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, International Journal of Clinical Practice and Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact