M. Cattenot

763 citations
25 papers · 685 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

M. Cattenot

25 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

M. Cattenot
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Mechanical Engineering 568
  • Catalysis 86
  • Organic Chemistry 340
  • Materials Chemistry 439
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 24
Replace Daniela Gulková with:
Daniela Gulková Czechia
J.C. Duchet France
Changlong Yin China
Weicheng Wu China
J.L. Lemberton France
Christophe Geantet France
Florentino Murrieta-Guevara Mexico
Mure Te United States
L.D. Sharma India
Miguel Estrada Mexico
M. Cattenot relative to Daniela Gulková Czechia Daniela Gulková's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Daniela Gulková · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Cattenot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Cattenot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Cattenot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Cattenot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Cattenot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Cattenot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Cattenot. The network helps show where M. Cattenot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Cattenot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Cattenot Line = papers co-authored together M. Cattenot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198885
2 200372
3 199866
4 199766
5 199148
6 199137
7 199733
8 200529
9 200828
10 199127
11 198824
12 200024
13 199524
14 200119
15 200218
16 200513
17 200013
18 200313
19 200112
20 19959

About M. Cattenot

M. Cattenot is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Catalysis, having authored 25 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (23 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (11 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (8 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (4 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (4 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (3 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (3 papers) and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (568 citations), Catalysis (86 citations), Organic Chemistry (340 citations), Materials Chemistry (439 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (24 citations). M. Cattenot has collaborated with scholars based in France, Brazil and Japan. Frequent co-authors include M. Breysse, J.L. Portefaix, C. Geantet, José Luiz Zotin, M. Vrinat, Júlio Carlos Afonso, Jean Thivolle‐Cazat, Françoise Maugé, Michel Lacroix and J.C. Lavalley. Their work appears in journals such as Catalysis Today, Journal of Catalysis, Catalysis Letters, Applied Catalysis A General and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact