M. C. Nesheim

5.6k citations
162 papers · 4.3k · 1 hit paper · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

M. C. Nesheim

158 papers receiving 3.8k citations

M. C. Nesheim's Hit Papers

Nutrition of the Chicken 1982 · 612 citations
6120+14+29Years since publication200400600

Peers

M. C. Nesheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.8k
  • Parasitology 1.0k
  • Small Animals 482
  • Aquatic Science 436
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 788
Replace S. Hurwitz with:
S. Hurwitz Israel
H.L. Classen Canada
R.D. MILES United States
D. E. Ullrey United States
Saleh Al‐Quraishy Saudi Arabia
S. Leeson Canada
V. Bruggeman Belgium
Yi Geng China
O.M. Onagbesan Belgium
Geert Janssens Belgium
M. C. Nesheim relative to S. Hurwitz Israel S. Hurwitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
S. Hurwitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Nesheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Nesheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Nesheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Nesheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Nesheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Nesheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Nesheim. The network helps show where M. C. Nesheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. C. Nesheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. C. Nesheim Line = papers co-authored together M. C. Nesheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Nutrition of the Chicken
Hit paper breakdown →
1982612
2 2002385
3 1965221
4 1981109
5 1972100
6 198088
7 197086
8 196778
9 196474
10 199273
11
Ascariasis and its public health significance.
198568
12 198064
13
Ascariasis and its prevention and control.
198964
14 198861
15 198960
16 197360
17 196258
18 195856
19 198151
20 198350

About M. C. Nesheim

M. C. Nesheim is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Parasitology, Small Animals, Nutrition and Dietetics and Ecology, having authored 162 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (48 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (35 papers), Helminth infection and control (17 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (14 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (14 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (11 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (9 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.8k citations), Parasitology (1.0k citations), Small Animals (482 citations), Aquatic Science (436 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (788 citations). M. C. Nesheim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include D. W. T. Crompton, Milton L. Scott, Robert J. Young, R.M. Leach, D. W. T. Crompton, Z. Pawłowski, Richard E. Austic, D.T. Hopkins, J.D. Garlich and Elisabet Forsum. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Poultry Science, Parasitology, Experimental Biology and Medicine and British Journal Of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact