Μ. Bush
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 22
- Ecology 22
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 19
- Co-authors
- David E. Wildt (34 shared papers)Stephen J. O’Brien (9 shared papers)D. E. Wildt (15 shared papers)Janine L. Brown (14 shared papers)Melody E. Roelke (4 shared papers)D.G.A. Meltzer (3 shared papers)L. P. Colly (2 shared papers)James F. Evermann (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (19 papers)Reproduction (17 papers)Biology of Reproduction (7 papers)Theriogenology (4 papers)Zoo Biology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Μ. Bush
96 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Μ. Bush's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Reproductive Medicine 1.3k
- Small Animals 672
- Agronomy and Crop Science 724
- Genetics 1.7k
- Ecology 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Μ. Bush
This map shows the geographic impact of Μ. Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Μ. Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Μ. Bush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Μ. Bush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Μ. Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Μ. Bush. The network helps show where Μ. Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Μ. Bush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah Hit paper breakdown → | 1985 | 725 |
| 2 | 1983 | 348 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 327 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 296 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 180 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 175 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 152 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 133 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 123 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 104 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 103 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 93 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 89 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 85 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 80 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 78 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 76 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 68 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 64 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 59 |
About Μ. Bush
Μ. Bush is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Ecology, Small Animals, Genetics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (22 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (16 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (14 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (10 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (7 papers) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.3k citations), Small Animals (672 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (724 citations), Genetics (1.7k citations) and Ecology (1.5k citations). Μ. Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include David E. Wildt, Stephen J. O’Brien, D. E. Wildt, Janine L. Brown, Melody E. Roelke, D.G.A. Meltzer, L. P. Colly, James F. Evermann, Andrea K. Newman and Jeremy Howard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Reproduction, Biology of Reproduction, Theriogenology and Zoo Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.