M Amiel

1.2k citations
79 papers · 925 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

M Amiel

67 papers receiving 866 citations

Peers

M Amiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 441
  • Internal Medicine 54
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 31
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 137
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 191
Replace Friedrich Knollmann with:
Friedrich Knollmann Germany
Andreu F. Costa Canada
Augustinus L. Jacob Switzerland
Thomas B. Ivanc United States
Thorsten Fleiter United States
Jeffery Justin United States
Jadranka Stojanovska United States
Yasushi Terada Japan
Silke Bosk Germany
Hiroaki Naito Japan
M Amiel relative to Friedrich Knollmann Germany Friedrich Knollmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Friedrich Knollmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M Amiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M Amiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Amiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Amiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M Amiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Amiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Amiel. The network helps show where M Amiel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M Amiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M Amiel Line = papers co-authored together M Amiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995107
2 199466
3 199361
4 199461
5 199956
6 199456
7 198949
8 199337
9 197937
10 199436
11 199636
12
Magnetic resonance imaging of human orthotopic heart transplantation: correlation with endomyocardial biopsy.
198926
13 199425
14 198324
15 199321
16 199519
17 199118
18 199816
19 199015
20 199415

About M Amiel

M Amiel is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 79 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (17 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (5 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (5 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (441 citations), Internal Medicine (54 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (31 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (137 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (191 citations). M Amiel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Revel, Philippe Douek, Pierre Loubeyre, Didier Revel, J. Villard, Emmanuelle Canet, Pierre Croisille, G. GÉNIN, Isabelle E. Magnin and R. Goutte. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, Investigative Radiology, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Signal Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact