Lyn Forster
Impact in
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Plant and animal studies
- Genetics top 10%
- Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Genetic diversity and population structure
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 4
- Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy 2
- Genetics 7
- Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies 6
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 3
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- R. R. Forster (1 shared paper)Frances M. Murphy (1 shared paper)W. F. Baldwin (1 shared paper)Bryan F. J. Manly (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Arachnology (2 papers)Biometrical Journal (1 paper)American Scientist (1 paper)New Zealand Journal of Zoology (4 papers)New Zealand Entomologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Lyn Forster
10 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 188
- Genetics 190
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 61
- Insect Science 24
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 17
Countries citing papers authored by Lyn Forster
This map shows the geographic impact of Lyn Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyn Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyn Forster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lyn Forster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyn Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyn Forster. The network helps show where Lyn Forster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Lyn Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vision and Prey-Catching Strategies in Jumping Spiders | 1982 | 111 |
| 2 | 1979 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 2 |
About Lyn Forster
Lyn Forster is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (3 papers), Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy (2 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (1 paper), Optical measurement and interference techniques (1 paper) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (188 citations), Genetics (190 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (61 citations), Insect Science (24 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (17 citations). Lyn Forster has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. R. Forster, Frances M. Murphy, W. F. Baldwin and Bryan F. J. Manly. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Arachnology, Biometrical Journal, American Scientist, New Zealand Journal of Zoology and New Zealand Entomologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.