Lyman B. Smith

761 citations
58 papers · 492 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Lyman B. Smith

56 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Lyman B. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 424
  • Plant Science 131
  • Cell Biology 50
  • Forestry 12
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 31
Replace Melva N. Philipson with:
Melva N. Philipson New Zealand
J. A. Leussink Netherlands
Carroll E. Wood United States
R C Carolin Australia
Hardev Singh India
Trevor G. Walker United Kingdom
Rodolfo E. G. Pichi Sermolli Italy
Jess A. Peirson United States
Murray J. Henwood Australia
John K. Boggan United States
Lyman B. Smith relative to Melva N. Philipson New Zealand Melva N. Philipson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Melva N. Philipson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lyman B. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lyman B. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyman B. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyman B. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lyman B. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyman B. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyman B. Smith. The network helps show where Lyman B. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Lyman B. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lyman B. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Lyman B. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197664
2 195545
3 196743
4 199341
5 197533
6 198131
7
A Synopsis of the American Velloziaceae
196225
8 197418
9 198914
10 196414
11 196711
12 199010
13 19849
14 19699
15 19649
16 19668
17 19928
18
Revisio Violacearum Colombiae
19547
19 19867
20 19725

About Lyman B. Smith

Lyman B. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (41 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (34 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (30 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (9 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers) and Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (424 citations), Plant Science (131 citations), Cell Biology (50 citations), Forestry (12 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (31 citations). Lyman B. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Edward S. Ayensu, Mark A. Spencer, A. Burkart, W. John Kress, R. J. Downs, Thomas Morley, Marie L. Farr, Ghillean Τ. Prance, Scott A. Mori and David W. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Taxon, JAMA, Kew Bulletin and Caldasia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact