Luke Wharton

418 citations
28 papers · 313 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Wharton

25 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Luke Wharton
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 230
  • Inorganic Chemistry 67
  • Analytical Chemistry 34
  • Radiation 26
  • Pharmaceutical Science 12
Replace S. A. Kandil with:
S. A. Kandil Egypt
Marı́a de Guadalupe Jaraquemada-Peláez Canada
A. A. Lumpov Russia
Mark Brugh United States
Tara Mastren United States
T.A. Butler United States
Dmitry Filosofov Russia
Andréa Sabatié‐Gogova France
Deborah I. Bunin United States
Marianna Tosato Italy
Luke Wharton relative to S. A. Kandil Egypt S. A. Kandil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
S. A. Kandil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Wharton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Wharton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Wharton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Wharton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Wharton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Wharton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Wharton. The network helps show where Luke Wharton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Wharton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Wharton Line = papers co-authored together Luke Wharton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201546
2 202142
3 202130
4 202318
5 202117
6 202216
7 202315
8 202213
9 202113
10 202212
11 202211
12 20249
13 20248
14 20228
15 20228
16 20247
17 20247
18 20217
19 20216
20 20215

About Luke Wharton

Luke Wharton is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (25 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (8 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (230 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (67 citations), Analytical Chemistry (34 citations), Radiation (26 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (12 citations). Luke Wharton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Valery Radchenko, Hua Yang, Paul Schaffer, Chris Orvig, Justin J. Wilson, Caterina F. Ramogida, Samantha N. MacMillan, Victoria Brown, François Bénard and Cristina Rodríguez‐Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Bioconjugate Chemistry, Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact