Luke Ternes

877 citations
8 papers · 488 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cell Image Analysis Techniques 4
    • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 2
    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 1

Luke Ternes

8 papers receiving 482 citations

Luke Ternes's Hit Papers

The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting Tumor Transitions across Space and Time at Single-Cell Resolution 2020 · 375 citations
3750+2+4Years since publication100200300

Peers

Luke Ternes
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Biophysics 112
  • Cancer Research 119
  • Molecular Biology 313
  • Oncology 97
  • Immunology 53
Replace Chi-Yun Wu with:
Chi-Yun Wu United States
Edward Novikov United States
Erik Ames Burlingame United States
Kamyar Esmaeili Pourfarhangi United States
Rozelle Laquindanum United States
Fatemeh Alikarami‬ United States
Katie E. Blise United States
Madison Tyler United States
Heba Ijaz United States
Jennifer Flournoy United States
Luke Ternes relative to Chi-Yun Wu United States Chi-Yun Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chi-Yun Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Ternes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Ternes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Ternes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Ternes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Ternes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Ternes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Ternes. The network helps show where Luke Ternes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Luke Ternes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Ternes Line = papers co-authored together Luke Ternes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting Tumor Transitions across Space and Time at Single-Cell Resolution
Hit paper breakdown →
2020375
2 202248
3 202229
4 202315
5 20239
6 20207
7 20224
8 20241

About Luke Ternes

Luke Ternes is a scholar working on Biophysics, Cancer Research, Artificial Intelligence, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (4 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (112 citations), Cancer Research (119 citations), Molecular Biology (313 citations), Oncology (97 citations) and Immunology (53 citations). Luke Ternes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Young Hwan Chang, Joe W. Gray, Sean M. Gross, Laura M. Heiser, Marilyne Labrie, Mark A. Dane, Gordon Brent Mills, Jia‐Ren Lin, Yuan Chen and Christian Lanciault. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pathology, Cell, PLoS Computational Biology, Nature Communications and Nature Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact