Luke Goode

864 citations
13 papers · 507 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Social Media and Politics
    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
    • Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
    • Misinformation and Its Impacts
    • Digital Games and Media

Papers in

Luke Goode

12 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Luke Goode
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Communication 291
  • Sociology and Political Science 228
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Literature and Literary Theory 31
  • Family Practice 6
Replace Friedrich Krotz with:
Friedrich Krotz Germany
Scott R. Maier United States
Brian J. Bowe United States
Jacqui Ewart Australia
Mireille Lalancette Canada
Joyce Y. M. Nip Australia
Brendan R. Watson United States
Graham Meikle Slovenia
Marcus Maurer Germany
Will Mari United States
Luke Goode relative to Friedrich Krotz Germany Friedrich Krotz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Friedrich Krotz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Goode

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Goode's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Goode with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Goode more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Goode

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Goode. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Goode. The network helps show where Luke Goode may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Luke Goode, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Goode Line = papers co-authored together Luke Goode links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2009279
2
Jurgen Habermas: Democracy and the Public Sphere
200570
3 201735
4 201026
5 199824
6 201524
7 201823
8 201813
9
Unruly publics and the fourth estate on YouTube
20118
10 20252
11 20251
12 20051
13 20171

About Luke Goode

Luke Goode is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, General Health Professions, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (291 citations), Sociology and Political Science (228 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations) and Family Practice (6 citations). Luke Goode has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Sweden and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas S. Inui, William T. Williams, Ron J. Anderson, Robert M. Daugherty, Steve Matthewman and Raven Cretney. Their work appears in journals such as Culture Unbound Journal of Current Cultural Research, Popular Communication, Academic Medicine, New Media & Society and Citizenship Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact