Lukas Schott

661 citations
4 papers · 91 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Lukas Schott

4 papers receiving 89 citations

Peers

Lukas Schott
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Artificial Intelligence 62
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 27
  • Software 5
  • Signal Processing 10
  • Biophysics 3
Replace Zachary Nado with:
Zachary Nado United States
Maksym Andriushchenko Germany
Matthias Gallé France
Fabrice Muhlenbach France
Markus L. Schmid Germany
Lea Schönherr Germany
Priscila Machado Vieira Lima Brazil
Amjad Almahairi United States
Madhuri Shanbhogue United States
Sam Toyer United States
Lukas Schott relative to Zachary Nado United States Zachary Nado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Zachary Nado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas Schott. The network helps show where Lukas Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Lukas Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas Schott Line = papers co-authored together Lukas Schott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
Towards the First Adversarially Robust Neural Network Model on MNIST
201954
2
Increasing the robustness of DNNs against image corruptions by playing the Game of Noise
202016
3 201715
4
Robust Perception through Analysis by Synthesis.
20186

About Lukas Schott

Lukas Schott is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Signal Processing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 4 papers that have together received 91 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (3 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (1 paper), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (1 paper), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (1 paper) and Music and Audio Processing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (62 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (27 citations), Software (5 citations), Signal Processing (10 citations) and Biophysics (3 citations). Lukas Schott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Bethge, Wieland Brendel, Jonas Rauber, Shengdong Zhang, Naveen Ramakrishnan, Mohak Shah, R. Zimmermann, Evgenia Rusak and Oliver Bringmann. Their work appears in journals such as MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) and arXiv (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact