Luise Springer

830 citations
25 papers · 547 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Luise Springer

24 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Luise Springer
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Rehabilitation 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 326
  • Occupational Therapy 62
  • Neurology 34
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 65
Replace Ineke van der Meulen with:
Ineke van der Meulen Netherlands
W. Mieke E. van de Sandt‐Koenderman Netherlands
Antje Lorenz Germany
İlknur Maviş Türkiye
Christos Salis United Kingdom
Alan Finlayson Canada
Reza Nilipour Iran
RACHEL M. DAVID United Kingdom
Ralf Glindemann Germany
Tamara B. Cranfill United Kingdom
Luise Springer relative to Ineke van der Meulen Netherlands Ineke van der Meulen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ineke van der Meulen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luise Springer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luise Springer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luise Springer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luise Springer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luise Springer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luise Springer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luise Springer. The network helps show where Luise Springer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Luise Springer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luise Springer Line = papers co-authored together Luise Springer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017266
2 200040
3 200940
4 200837
5 201026
6 199325
7 201321
8 201315
9 200812
10 200912
11 200810
12 20046
13 19875
14 20065
15
An assessment of PACE therapy
19954
16 19984
17 20134
18
Signale der Störung
20033
19 20093
20 20103

About Luise Springer

Luise Springer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Clinical Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (14 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (2 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (326 citations), Occupational Therapy (62 citations), Neurology (34 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (65 citations). Luise Springer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Walter Huber, Willmes Klaus, Klaus Poeck, Ruth Nobis‐Bosch, Ralf Klamma, Marc Spaniol, Wolfram Ziegler, Dorothea Weniger, Peter L. Auer and Caterina Breitenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Journal of Neurolinguistics, The Lancet, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact