Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo

411 citations
15 papers · 261 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo

13 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Insect Science 72
  • Soil Science 55
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 67
  • Plant Science 145
  • Ecology 46
Replace Bala Singavarapu with:
Bala Singavarapu Germany
Xuelin Wang China
Monika Welc Sweden
Guy F. Sutton South Africa
Renske Jongen Netherlands
Christa Lang Germany
Virgilijus Baliuckas Lithuania
Nur Edy Indonesia
Martine Huberty Netherlands
Terhi Hahl Switzerland
Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo relative to Bala Singavarapu Germany Bala Singavarapu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Bala Singavarapu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo. The network helps show where Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo Line = papers co-authored together Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201654
2 202039
3 202136
4 202132
5 202131
6 202226
7 202024
8 20235
9
First record of Saprolegnia sp. in an amphibian population in Colombia
20114
10 20114
11 20253
12 20112
13 20221
14 20250
15 20260

About Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo

Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Soil Science, Insect Science and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (2 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (72 citations), Soil Science (55 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (67 citations), Plant Science (145 citations) and Ecology (46 citations). Luis Daniel Prada‐Salcedo has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include François Buscot, Kezia Goldmann, Janna Wambsganss, Jürgen Bauhus, Anna Heintz‐Buschart, Thomas Reitz, Heike Heklau, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen, Olga Ferlian and Helge Bruelheide. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Molecular Plant, Functional Ecology, Pedobiologia and Environmental Microbiome.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact