Luigi Melfa

549 citations
9 papers · 262 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Acute Kidney Injury Research 2
    • Inflammasome and immune disorders 2
    • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes 2

Luigi Melfa

9 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Luigi Melfa
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Nephrology 102
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Internal Medicine 11
  • Gastroenterology 11
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 30
Replace Hao-Wei Kou with:
Hao-Wei Kou Taiwan
Armando Vázquez-Rangel Mexico
Nicolas Lerolle France
Ata Firouzi Iran
Vincent Brunot France
Yong Un Kang South Korea
Takao Sugai Japan
Irma L. Geenen Netherlands
Pierluigi Incerti Italy
Giorgio Triolo Italy
Luigi Melfa relative to Hao-Wei Kou Taiwan Hao-Wei Kou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Hao-Wei Kou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luigi Melfa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luigi Melfa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luigi Melfa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luigi Melfa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luigi Melfa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luigi Melfa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luigi Melfa. The network helps show where Luigi Melfa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Luigi Melfa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luigi Melfa Line = papers co-authored together Luigi Melfa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200172
2 200452
3
Covid-19 and its impact on nephropathic patients: the experience at Ospedale "Guglielmo da Saliceto" in Piacenza.
202040
4 200238
5 201429
6 201019
7 20218
8 20203
9 20211

About Luigi Melfa

Luigi Melfa is a scholar working on Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Inflammasome and immune disorders (2 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper) and Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (102 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations), Gastroenterology (11 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (30 citations). Luigi Melfa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Enrico Fiaccadori, Umberto Maggiore, Carlo Rotelli, Roberto Scarpioni, Marco Ricardi, A Borghetti, Aderville Cabassi, L Cristinelli, Tiziana Meschi and Edoardo Picetti. Their work appears in journals such as Kidney International, Clinical Rheumatology, Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Intensive Care Medicine and Journal of Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact