Luca Biasco

700 citations
37 papers · 409 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Luca Biasco

35 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Luca Biasco
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 315
  • Numerical Analysis 116
  • Mathematical Physics 113
  • Geometry and Topology 33
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 56
Replace Francesco Fassò with:
Francesco Fassò Italy
Renato Calleja Mexico
Pietro Baldi Italy
Xavier Gràcia Spain
Miguel C. Muñoz‐Lecanda Spain
Philippe Bolle France
Jordi Villanueva Spain
Alexey Samokhin Russia
Н. Г. Хорькова Russia
Andrew Russell Forsyth
Luca Biasco relative to Francesco Fassò Italy Francesco Fassò's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Francesco Fassò · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luca Biasco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Biasco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Biasco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Biasco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luca Biasco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Biasco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Biasco. The network helps show where Luca Biasco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Luca Biasco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luca Biasco Line = papers co-authored together Luca Biasco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201376
2 200361
3 200347
4 201140
5 201934
6 200621
7 200620
8 200319
9 20128
10 20098
11 20146
12 20056
13 20026
14
Periodic solutions of nonlinear wave equations with non-monotone forcing terms
20055
15 20065
16 20155
17 20235
18 20194
19 20083
20 20063

About Luca Biasco

Luca Biasco is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (32 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (11 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (7 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (7 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (5 papers) and Elasticity and Wave Propagation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (315 citations), Numerical Analysis (116 citations), Mathematical Physics (113 citations), Geometry and Topology (33 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (56 citations). Luca Biasco has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Massimiliano Berti, Luigi Chierchia, Michela Procesi, Philippe Bolle, Enrico Valdinoci, Massimiliano Berti, James Biggs, Dmitrii Valer'evich Treschev, Katherine Tooley and Daniele Zaccaria. Their work appears in journals such as Rendiconti Lincei Matematica e Applicazioni, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Journal of Nonlinear Science, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis and SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact