Luca Anderlini

1.3k citations
42 papers · 686 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Luca Anderlini

37 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Luca Anderlini
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Management Science and Operations Research 301
  • Economics and Econometrics 426
  • Safety Research 109
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Accounting 79
Replace Stefan Napel with:
Stefan Napel Germany
Leonardo Felli United Kingdom
Daniel A. Graham United States
Steven Callander United States
Chris William Sanchirico United States
Amrita Dhillon United Kingdom
John R. Chamberlin United States
James M. Enelow United States
Donald B. Hausch United States
Nicholas R. Miller United States
Luca Anderlini relative to Stefan Napel Germany Stefan Napel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Stefan Napel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luca Anderlini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Anderlini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Anderlini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Anderlini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luca Anderlini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Anderlini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Anderlini. The network helps show where Luca Anderlini may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Luca Anderlini, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luca Anderlini Line = papers co-authored together Luca Anderlini links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994102
2 199661
3 199956
4 200143
5 200341
6 200637
7 201331
8 199030
9 200128
10 200627
11 201527
12 199522
13 200621
14 200420
15 199917
16 200414
17 201113
18 199813
19 200912
20 200711

About Luca Anderlini

Luca Anderlini is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Law and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (18 papers), Game Theory and Applications (14 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (14 papers), Economic theories and models (14 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (8 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (6 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (6 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (301 citations), Economics and Econometrics (426 citations), Safety Research (109 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Accounting (79 citations). Luca Anderlini has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leonardo Felli, Antonella Ianni, Andrew Postlewaite, Roger Lagunoff, Dino Gerardi, David Canning, Hamid Sabourian, Alessandro Riboni, Giovanni Immordino and Nabil I. Al‐Najjar. Their work appears in journals such as Games and Economic Behavior, Review of Economic Dynamics, Econometrica, Economic Theory and The Review of Economic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact