Louise Wright

10 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Louise Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101
  • Molecular Medicine 82
  • Endocrinology 44
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 42
  • Clinical Biochemistry 45
Replace Jon Yankey with:
Jon Yankey United States
R.W.I. Cooke United Kingdom
Tali Braun Israel
Didier Schoevaerdts Belgium
Shao‐Huan Lan Taiwan
Li‐Chin Lu Taiwan
Katherine Prenovost United States
Tom Burroughs United States
Betsy Todd United States
Hsiang‐Chin Hsu Taiwan
Louise Wright relative to Jon Yankey United States Jon Yankey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jon Yankey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Louise Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Wright. The network helps show where Louise Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Louise Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Louise Wright Line = papers co-authored together Louise Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013104
2 198278
3 198163
4 201261
5 201250
6 201141
7 198933
8 20219
9 19832
10
Genetic engineering of the donor species to control hyperacute xenograft rejection.
19951

About Louise Wright

Louise Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Surgery, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (101 citations), Molecular Medicine (82 citations), Endocrinology (44 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (42 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (45 citations). Louise Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Gillespie, Rhonda L. Stuart, Steven P. Roose, Natalie M. Williams, B. Timothy Walsh, A H Glassman, J W Stewart, William D. Harrison, Samuel G. Siris and Timothy Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Clinical Infectious Diseases, American Journal of Psychiatry, The Medical Journal of Australia and ERJ Open Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact