John E. C. Brierley
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Comparative and International Law Studies
- Legal Studies and Policies
- Accounting top 10%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Law 3
- Comparative and International Law Studies 2
- Legal principles and applications 1
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
-
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction 2
- Co-authors
- René David (1 shared paper)Emilio S. Binavince (1 shared paper)Pierre Legrand (1 shared paper)Roderick A. Macdonald (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- University of Toronto Law Journal (3 papers)Revue internationale de droit comparé (1 paper)eYLS (Yale Law School) (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
John E. C. Brierley
5 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Law 99
- Accounting 89
- Political Science and International Relations 101
- Strategy and Management 52
- Public Administration 8
Countries citing papers authored by John E. C. Brierley
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. C. Brierley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. C. Brierley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. C. Brierley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. C. Brierley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. C. Brierley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. C. Brierley. The network helps show where John E. C. Brierley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside John E. C. Brierley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1970 | 193 | |
| 2 | Major legal systems in the world today: An introduction to the comparative study of law | 1978 | 104 |
| 3 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 4 | Quebec Legal Education Since 1945: Cultural Paradoxes and Traditional Ambiguities | 1986 | 3 |
| 5 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 8 | Гражданский кодекс Квебека | 1999 | 0 |
About John E. C. Brierley
John E. C. Brierley is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 8 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative and International Law Studies (2 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper), Legal Systems and Institutions (1 paper), Legal principles and applications (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Legal and Social Philosophy (1 paper) and Law, logistics, and international trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (99 citations), Accounting (89 citations), Political Science and International Relations (101 citations), Strategy and Management (52 citations) and Public Administration (8 citations). Frequent co-authors include René David, Emilio S. Binavince, René David, Pierre Legrand and Roderick A. Macdonald. Their work appears in journals such as University of Toronto Law Journal, Revue internationale de droit comparé, eYLS (Yale Law School) and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.