Long‐En Chen

47 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Long‐En Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 254
  • Developmental Neuroscience 53
  • Internal Medicine 40
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 193
  • Plant Science 437
Replace Yuji Taoka with:
Yuji Taoka Japan
Dean C. Gute United States
Pamela M. Le Quesne United Kingdom
Jogi V. Pattisapu United States
R Scelsi Italy
Anwar S. Abd‐Elfattah United States
Jean‐Paul Henry France
Tetsuya Hashimoto Japan
Amelia Toesca Italy
Tae Hee Oh United States
Long‐En Chen relative to Yuji Taoka Japan Yuji Taoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×48.6×
Yuji Taoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Long‐En Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Long‐En Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Long‐En Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Long‐En Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Long‐En Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Long‐En Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Long‐En Chen. The network helps show where Long‐En Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Long‐En Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Long‐En Chen Line = papers co-authored together Long‐En Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004493
2 199275
3 199959
4 199946
5 199745
6 199442
7 199537
8 199834
9 200430
10 199028
11
End-to-side nerve repair. A review.
200028
12 199824
13 199923
14 200423
15 200523
16 199623
17 199122
18 200022
19 200421
20 200520

About Long‐En Chen

Long‐En Chen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (20 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (12 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (10 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (9 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (8 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (254 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (53 citations), Internal Medicine (40 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (193 citations) and Plant Science (437 citations). Long‐En Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include James R. Urbaniak, Anthony V. Seaber, Charles W. Cook, Robert B. Jackson, Nigel M. Crawford, Ruhang Tang, Zhongguang Yang, Robert Stevens, Yikun He and Sun Mi Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Microsurgery, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, The Journal Of Hand Surgery and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact