Lones Smith

3.8k citations
36 papers · 1.5k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Lones Smith

34 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Lones Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Management Science and Operations Research 752
  • Safety Research 284
  • Economics and Econometrics 853
  • General Decision Sciences 45
  • Marketing 174
Replace MYRNA HOLTZ WOODERS with:
MYRNA HOLTZ WOODERS United States
Yann Bramoullé France
In-Koo Cho United States
Steven A. Matthews United States
David P. Myatt United Kingdom
Dorothea F. Kübler Germany
Alvaro Sandroni United States
Vijay Krishna United States
CHRISTOPHE P. CHAMLEY United States
Ramón Marimon Spain
Lones Smith relative to MYRNA HOLTZ WOODERS United States MYRNA HOLTZ WOODERS's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
MYRNA HOLTZ WOODERS · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lones Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lones Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lones Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lones Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lones Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lones Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lones Smith. The network helps show where Lones Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Lones Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lones Smith Line = papers co-authored together Lones Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000387
2 2000351
3 200193
4 200677
5 201776
6 199472
7 201470
8 200670
9 200146
10 199842
11 199239
12 201138
13 200934
14 200228
15 201522
16 200219
17 199515
18 202112
19 20137
20 20007

About Lones Smith

Lones Smith is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Safety Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (12 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (11 papers), Game Theory and Applications (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (752 citations), Safety Research (284 citations), Economics and Econometrics (853 citations), General Decision Sciences (45 citations) and Marketing (174 citations). Lones Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Shimer, Héctor Chade, Giuseppe Moscarini, Jan Eeckhout, Prajit K. Dutta, Axel Anderson, Dilip Abreu, Gordon K. Lewis, Marco Ottaviani and Peter Norman Sørensen. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, The Review of Economic Studies, American Economic Review, Mathematics of Computation and Journal of Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact