Lloyd D. Stringer

1.3k citations
53 papers · 981 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Lloyd D. Stringer

50 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

Lloyd D. Stringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Insect Science 688
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 389
  • Ecology 283
  • Genetics 263
  • Ecological Modeling 36
Replace E. Richard Hoebeke with:
E. Richard Hoebeke United States
D. A. Downie United States
Laurent Pélozuelo France
Gérard Delvare France
Kévin Tougeron France
Peter W. de Jong Netherlands
Peter F. Reagel United States
Pia Addison South Africa
Rodney T. Richardson United States
Jörg Samietz Switzerland
Lloyd D. Stringer relative to E. Richard Hoebeke United States E. Richard Hoebeke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
E. Richard Hoebeke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lloyd D. Stringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lloyd D. Stringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lloyd D. Stringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lloyd D. Stringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lloyd D. Stringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lloyd D. Stringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lloyd D. Stringer. The network helps show where Lloyd D. Stringer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lloyd D. Stringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lloyd D. Stringer Line = papers co-authored together Lloyd D. Stringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013139
2 201494
3 201371
4 200838
5 201437
6 201032
7 201127
8 200926
9 200924
10 201923
11 202123
12 201723
13 201122
14 201121
15 201921
16 200720
17 201420
18 200819
19 202219
20 201018

About Lloyd D. Stringer

Lloyd D. Stringer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (20 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (17 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (16 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (14 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (12 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (9 papers) and Hemiptera Insect Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (688 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (389 citations), Ecology (283 citations), Genetics (263 citations) and Ecological Modeling (36 citations). Lloyd D. Stringer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. M. Suckling, John M. Kean, Ashraf M. El‐Sayed, Patrick C. Tobin, Andrea Stephens, Daniel A. Herms, Deborah G. McCullough, Bill Woods, Lee‐Anne Manning and Philip J. Lester. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Journal of Economic Entomology, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Insects and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact