L.K. Keys

42 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

L.K. Keys
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 82
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 56
  • Materials Chemistry 306
  • Polymers and Plastics 92
  • Catalysis 40
Replace Yanyan Wu with:
Yanyan Wu China
Wenbo Yu China
Jan Procházka Czechia
Hongquan Jiang China
Yuehong Yin China
Finn Jensen Denmark
Shailendra Singh Sweden
Qi Lu China
Yu‐Chun Huang Taiwan
L.K. Keys relative to Yanyan Wu China Yanyan Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Yanyan Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.K. Keys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.K. Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.K. Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.K. Keys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.K. Keys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.K. Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.K. Keys. The network helps show where L.K. Keys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside L.K. Keys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.K. Keys Line = papers co-authored together L.K. Keys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197087
2 196863
3 196763
4 199654
5 199047
6 196627
7 200825
8 199222
9 196720
10 196718
11 196715
12 196915
13 196913
14 196712
15 198711
16 198811
17 196411
18 197510
19 19919
20 19978

About L.K. Keys

L.K. Keys is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 49 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Manufacturing Process and Optimization (13 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (10 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (8 papers), Product Development and Customization (6 papers), Mechatronics Education and Applications (5 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (5 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (82 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (56 citations), Materials Chemistry (306 citations), Polymers and Plastics (92 citations) and Catalysis (40 citations). L.K. Keys has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. Moteff, L. N. Mulay, James P. Smith, Curtis R. Partington, Jennifer C. Lovejoy, George A. Bray, Andrea Sparti, Wasfy B. Mikhael, T. Warren Liao and Robert Hirschfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Mechatronics and Journal of Nuclear Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact