Liu We

1.4k citations
182 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Liu We

150 papers receiving 954 citations

Peers

Liu We
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 133
  • Communication 79
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 112
  • Business and International Management 21
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 91
Replace Zahari Taha with:
Zahari Taha Malaysia
Victor B. Kreng Taiwan
Zheng Liu China
Rohit Kumar Gupta India
Sachin K. Patil India
Leon Pretorius South Africa
Linda Newnes United Kingdom
John V. Farr United States
Marco Bertoni Sweden
Katsumori Matsushima Japan
Liu We relative to Zahari Taha Malaysia Zahari Taha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Zahari Taha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liu We

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liu We's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liu We with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liu We more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liu We

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liu We. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liu We. The network helps show where Liu We may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liu We, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liu We Line = papers co-authored together Liu We links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 182 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009110
2 199569
3 201463
4 200941
5 202140
6 202132
7 201831
8 202028
9 201728
10 201227
11 201826
12 201925
13 199923
14 202020
15 202119
16 202019
17 202017
18 202015
19 201815
20 201914

About Liu We

Liu We is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 182 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (13 papers), Product Development and Customization (10 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers), Geoscience and Mining Technology (6 papers), Industrial Technology and Control Systems (6 papers), Safety and Risk Management (4 papers), Smart Grid and Power Systems (4 papers) and Power Systems and Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (133 citations), Communication (79 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (112 citations), Business and International Management (21 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (91 citations). Liu We has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Runhua Tan, Kathryn M. Bartol, Xiangquan Zeng, Zibiao Li, Tao Chen, Jinpu Zhang, Wei Gu, Junpeng Zhu, Zaijun Wu and Bo Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Poultry Science, Advanced Engineering Materials and World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact