Li-Te Cheng

1.4k citations
35 papers · 931 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Li-Te Cheng

35 papers receiving 872 citations

Peers

Li-Te Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Computer Science Applications 310
  • Human-Computer Interaction 221
  • Information Systems 622
  • Software 69
  • Communication 100
Replace Franklyn Turbak with:
Franklyn Turbak United States
Sabrina Marczak Brazil
Fabio Calefato Italy
Aurora Vizcaíno Spain
Vibha Singhal Sinha India
Neil Iscoe United States
Emitzá Guzmán Germany
Brent N. Reeves United States
Giuseppe Valetto United States
Juan Manuel Dodero Spain
Li-Te Cheng relative to Franklyn Turbak United States Franklyn Turbak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Franklyn Turbak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li-Te Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li-Te Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li-Te Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li-Te Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li-Te Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li-Te Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li-Te Cheng. The network helps show where Li-Te Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li-Te Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li-Te Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Li-Te Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010149
2 200387
3 200477
4 200675
5 200373
6 200458
7 200455
8 201351
9 200946
10 200341
11 199629
12 200327
13 200921
14
Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA workshop on Eclipse technology eXchange
200518
15 200318
16 200417
17 200411
18 200510
19 200610
20 20109

About Li-Te Cheng

Li-Te Cheng is a scholar working on Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Management and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 35 papers that have together received 931 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (12 papers), Software Engineering Research (12 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (9 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (7 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (6 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (310 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (221 citations), Information Systems (622 citations), Software (69 citations) and Communication (100 citations). Li-Te Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John Patterson, Margaret‐Anne Storey, Steven Ross, Susanne Hupfer, Cleidson R. B. de Souza, Arie van Deursen, Christoph Treude, David R. Millen, David Redmiles and John A. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), IEEE Software, IEEE Intelligent Systems and Queue.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact