Lisbeth Messeter

491 citations
21 papers · 408 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lisbeth Messeter

20 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Messeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Hematology 212
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 122
  • Physiology 124
  • Immunology 79
  • Biochemistry 22
Replace M. M. Pickles with:
M. M. Pickles United Kingdom
H Seyfried Poland
M. N. Metaxas Switzerland
F G Staber Australia
A. Poschmann Germany
P. H. Renton Nigeria
Alendry P. Caviles United States
Porter Rr
M. KONISHI Japan
Douglas C. Lee United States
Lisbeth Messeter relative to M. M. Pickles United Kingdom M. M. Pickles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. M. Pickles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Messeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Messeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Messeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Messeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Messeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Messeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Messeter. The network helps show where Lisbeth Messeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Messeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Messeter Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Messeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974103
2 198763
3 198442
4 199041
5 198832
6 198525
7 198419
8 197414
9 197910
10 19809
11 19819
12 19879
13 19808
14 19776
15 19776
16 19776
17 19842
18 19871
19 19781
20
[Rh-prophylaxis or not? Obstetric departments should make decisions if there are medical reasons which justify the treatment].
20001

About Lisbeth Messeter

Lisbeth Messeter is a scholar working on Hematology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood groups and transfusion (12 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (1 paper) and Spam and Phishing Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (212 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (122 citations), Physiology (124 citations), Immunology (79 citations) and Biochemistry (22 citations). Lisbeth Messeter has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Huang Shu, Arne Lundblad, Michael Chester, Elwira Lisowska, Bo E. Samuelsson, Rafaël Oriol, Maria Duk, Marcin Czerwiński, Thomas Brodin and David A. Zopf. Their work appears in journals such as Vox Sanguinis, European Journal of Biochemistry, Transfusion, Acta Paediatrica and FEBS Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact