Lisbeth Claesson

23 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Claesson
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Rehabilitation 424
  • Occupational Therapy 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 249
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 44
  • Epidemiology 304
Replace Cherry Kilbride with:
Cherry Kilbride United Kingdom
Hui‐Fen Mao Taiwan
G. Yavuzer Türkiye
Mary Vining Radomski United States
Esme Worthington United Kingdom
Joanna Harrison United Kingdom
Brendan Conroy United States
M. L. Holbrook United Kingdom
Naoimh E. McMahon United Kingdom
Nor Azlin Mohd Nordin Malaysia
Lisbeth Claesson relative to Cherry Kilbride United Kingdom Cherry Kilbride's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Cherry Kilbride · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Claesson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Claesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Claesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Claesson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Claesson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Claesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Claesson. The network helps show where Lisbeth Claesson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Claesson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Claesson Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Claesson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004114
2 200899
3 200095
4 200066
5 201152
6
Virtual rehabilitation after stroke.
200849
7 201945
8 200731
9 201730
10 200228
11
Use and cost of assistive technology the first year after stroke. A randomized controlled trial.
200224
12 200917
13 200217
14 200316
15 200113
16 202011
17 20179
18 20127
19 20057
20 20075

About Lisbeth Claesson

Lisbeth Claesson is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy and General Health Professions, having authored 23 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (18 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (424 citations), Occupational Therapy (71 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (249 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (44 citations) and Epidemiology (304 citations). Lisbeth Claesson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Christian Blomstrand, Gunilla Gosman‐Hedström, Björn Fagerberg, Katharina S. Sunnerhagen, Thomas Lindén, Ingmar Skoog, Jürgen Broeren, Martin Rydmark, Magnus Johannesson and Katarina Jood. Their work appears in journals such as Cerebrovascular Diseases, Stroke, Brain Behavior and Immunity, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine and European Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact