Lisa Schmidthuber

31 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

Lisa Schmidthuber
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Public Administration 111
  • Information Systems and Management 139
  • Communication 107
  • Media Technology 128
  • Political Science and International Relations 366
Replace Peter Daiser with:
Peter Daiser Germany
Carla Bonina United Kingdom
Hyun Jeong Kim South Korea
Teta Stamati Greece
Ida Lindgren Sweden
Savita Bailur United Kingdom
Jon Gant United States
Kuno Schedler Switzerland
Dennis Linders United States
Jeppe Agger Nielsen Denmark
Lisa Schmidthuber relative to Peter Daiser Germany Peter Daiser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Peter Daiser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Schmidthuber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Schmidthuber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Schmidthuber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Schmidthuber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Schmidthuber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Schmidthuber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Schmidthuber. The network helps show where Lisa Schmidthuber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Schmidthuber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Schmidthuber Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Schmidthuber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018127
2 201991
3 202084
4 201880
5 202078
6 201960
7 201752
8 202339
9 201735
10 201930
11 202225
12 202224
13 201720
14 202019
15 202119
16 201918
17 202112
18 201811
19 20219
20 20238

About Lisa Schmidthuber

Lisa Schmidthuber is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 38 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include E-Government and Public Services (20 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (111 citations), Information Systems and Management (139 citations), Communication (107 citations), Media Technology (128 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (366 citations). Lisa Schmidthuber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Hilgers, Alex Ingrams, Daniela Maresch, Sebastian Hofmann, Frank T. Piller, Marcel Bogers, Marc Holzer, Aroon Manoharan, Thomas Gegenhuber and Jürgen Willems. Their work appears in journals such as Government Information Quarterly, VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Public Administration Review, International Public Management Journal and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact