Lisa Putzar

650 citations
11 papers · 403 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lisa Putzar

11 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Lisa Putzar
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 325
  • Sensory Systems 77
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 45
  • Developmental Biology 4
Replace David W. Royal with:
David W. Royal United States
Holger Franz Sperdin Switzerland
Máté Aller United Kingdom
Aaron Nidiffer United States
Katharina Anton-Erxleben United States
Jane V. Elsley United Kingdom
Benoît A. Bacon Canada
Huriye Atilgan United Kingdom
Maria J. S. Guerreiro Germany
Souta Hidaka Japan
Lisa Putzar relative to David W. Royal United States David W. Royal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David W. Royal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Putzar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Putzar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Putzar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Putzar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Putzar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Putzar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Putzar. The network helps show where Lisa Putzar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Putzar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Putzar Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Putzar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007128
2 201075
3 201546
4 200735
5 201625
6 201224
7 201021
8 201619
9 201519
10 201610
11 20251

About Lisa Putzar

Lisa Putzar is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (325 citations), Sensory Systems (77 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (45 citations) and Developmental Biology (4 citations). Lisa Putzar has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brigitte Röder, Kirsten Hötting, Frank Rösler, Maria J. S. Guerreiro, Ines Goerendt, Kathrin Lange, Matthias Gondan, Gisbert Richard, Tobias Heed and Christian Büchel. Their work appears in journals such as Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Current Biology, Brain and Nature Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact