Lisa O’Connell

23 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

Lisa O’Connell
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 310
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 369
  • Ecological Modeling 41
  • Genetics 208
  • Plant Science 257
Replace Barbara E. Giles with:
Barbara E. Giles Sweden
Marie‐Hélène Chevallier France
Göte Turesson Germany
Antti Lammi Finland
Hai‐Qin Sun China
Melissa A. Millar Australia
Martha S. Witter United States
Catherine A. Rushworth United States
Kelsey L. Glennon South Africa
Christopher T. Ivey United States
Lisa O’Connell relative to Barbara E. Giles Sweden Barbara E. Giles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Barbara E. Giles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa O’Connell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa O’Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa O’Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa O’Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa O’Connell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa O’Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa O’Connell. The network helps show where Lisa O’Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Lisa O’Connell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa O’Connell Line = papers co-authored together Lisa O’Connell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998153
2 200683
3 200760
4 199859
5 200455
6 200833
7 200426
8
Differentiation in reproductive strategy between sexual and asexual populations of Antennaria parlinii (Asteraceae)
200124
9 200623
10 200119
11 199918
12 200011
13 20059
14 20097
15 19996
16 20035
17 20013
18 20023
19 20112
20 20171

About Lisa O’Connell

Lisa O’Connell is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, History and Plant Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 604 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (310 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (369 citations), Ecological Modeling (41 citations), Genetics (208 citations) and Plant Science (257 citations). Lisa O’Connell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark O. Johnston, Ale× Mosseler, Om P. Rajora, Christopher G. Eckert, Kermit Ritland, John H. Russell, Kermit Ritland, Stacey Lee Thompson, Frédérique Viard and Carol Ritland. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Journal of Heredity, Ecology, NOVEL A Forum on Fiction and Eighteenth-Century Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact