Lis Wagner

91 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Lis Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Research and Theory 29
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 80
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 191
  • Pharmacy 51
  • General Health Professions 264
Replace Carrie Jo Braden with:
Carrie Jo Braden United States
Donald E. Bailey United States
Marjorie L. Pearson United States
Cynthia Delgado United States
Christine Newburn‐Cook Canada
Marie-Ève Poitras Canada
Jenni Burt United Kingdom
Hans Philipsen Netherlands
AnneLoes van Staa Netherlands
Sally Wellard Australia
Lis Wagner relative to Carrie Jo Braden United States Carrie Jo Braden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Carrie Jo Braden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lis Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lis Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lis Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lis Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lis Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lis Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lis Wagner. The network helps show where Lis Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lis Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lis Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Lis Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009181
2 2005105
3 200778
4 201570
5 201057
6 201148
7 201347
8 201244
9 201243
10 201341
11 201037
12 201136
13 201834
14 201428
15 201326
16 201025
17 201124
18 201324
19 201124
20 200522

About Lis Wagner

Lis Wagner is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (29 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (80 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (191 citations), Pharmacy (51 citations) and General Health Professions (264 citations). Lis Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet, Jan Erik Henriksen, Jane Clemensen, Dorthe Boe Danbjørg, Jette Primdahl, Kim Hørslev‐Petersen, Werner Vach, Elisabeth O.C. Hall, Bente Høy and Thora Grothe Thomsen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Nursing Review, Patient Education and Counseling, Acta Oncologica and Obesity Facts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact