Ling-Ling Lee

2.4k citations
35 papers · 827 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ling-Ling Lee

33 papers receiving 775 citations

Peers

Ling-Ling Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Developmental Biology 33
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Ecological Modeling 38
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 47
  • Physiology 140
Replace Garth Fuller with:
Garth Fuller United States
Beth Hahn United States
Alissa R. Link United States
Elizabeth Procter-Gray United States
Kate Richardson United Kingdom
Zhengzhen Wang China
Karl E. Miller United States
Michael Dulin United States
Meghan E. Short United States
Mária Tóth Hungary
Ling-Ling Lee relative to Garth Fuller United States Garth Fuller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Garth Fuller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling-Ling Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling-Ling Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling-Ling Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling-Ling Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling-Ling Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling-Ling Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling-Ling Lee. The network helps show where Ling-Ling Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling-Ling Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling-Ling Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ling-Ling Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008205
2 200693
3 200884
4 201083
5 200746
6 202239
7 200535
8 200130
9 200924
10 201921
11 200320
12 202119
13 200618
14 199614
15 200014
16
Temporal Variations in the Size and Composition of Formosan Leaf- nosed Bat (Hipposideros terasensis) Colonies in Central Taiwan
200412
17 202211
18 201010
19 20108
20 20168

About Ling-Ling Lee

Ling-Ling Lee is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Paleontology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (7 papers), Marine animal studies overview (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (33 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Ecological Modeling (38 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (47 citations) and Physiology (140 citations). Ling-Ling Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Antony Arthur, Mark Avis, Michael Craig Watson, Caroline Mulvaney, Shun‐Tsung Lo, Shoa‐Jen Perng, Gábor Csorba, Yin‐Ping Fang, Ching‐Hui Loh and Huei‐Kai Huang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, JAMA Dermatology, Journal of Mammalogy, International Journal of Primatology and Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact