Ling Jin

4.1k citations
145 papers · 2.6k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 39
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 13
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 12
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 9

Ling Jin

135 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Ling Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Applied Psychology 397
  • Ophthalmology 436
  • Epidemiology 551
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 168
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 248
Replace Mark W. Reid with:
Mark W. Reid United States
Patricia Zybert United States
Joanna Kelly United Kingdom
Sandra A. Ham United States
Ruth M. A. van Nispen Netherlands
Karen Steger-May United States
Elizabeth Holliday Australia
Pauline Campbell United Kingdom
Calum Mattocks United Kingdom
Markku Kauppinen Finland
Ling Jin relative to Mark W. Reid United States Mark W. Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Mark W. Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Jin. The network helps show where Ling Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Jin Line = papers co-authored together Ling Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010275
2 2012264
3 2011179
4 2010128
5 2012112
6 201886
7 202282
8 201071
9 201361
10 201556
11 202151
12 201351
13 201748
14 201144
15 201042
16 201039
17 201539
18 201537
19 201231
20 201930

About Ling Jin

Ling Jin is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 145 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (39 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (397 citations), Ophthalmology (436 citations), Epidemiology (551 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (168 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (248 citations). Ling Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David C. Mohr, Joyce Ho, Nathan Congdon, Juned Siddique, Douglas Reifler, Mingguang He, Kelly Glazer Baron, Kenneth A. Lehman, Michelle Nicole Burns and Leslie Sokol. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, BMJ Open, PLoS ONE and JAMA Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact