Ling Ge

728 citations
34 papers · 541 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA Research and Splicing 5
    • Gut microbiota and health 3
    • Muscle Physiology and Disorders 3
    • RNA modifications and cancer 3
    • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ 5

Ling Ge

33 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

Ling Ge
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cell Biology 92
  • Cancer Research 74
  • Hematology 43
  • Molecular Biology 235
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 18
Replace John Klimek with:
John Klimek United States
Uwe Janßen Germany
Sébastien Plançon Luxembourg
N S Thomas United Kingdom
Miranda Kleijn Netherlands
Yoon Ha Choi South Korea
Yanyan Hu China
Neha Patel United States
Litao Xie United States
Anne L. Robertson United States
Ling Ge relative to John Klimek United States John Klimek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
John Klimek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Ge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Ge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Ge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Ge. The network helps show where Ling Ge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Ge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Ge Line = papers co-authored together Ling Ge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200652
2 201450
3 201644
4 201830
5 201928
6 201327
7 202227
8 202226
9 202325
10 200721
11 202120
12 202119
13 202217
14 202215
15 201715
16 202314
17 201514
18 201913
19 202212
20 202211

About Ling Ge

Ling Ge is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cancer Research, Neurology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 34 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (5 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Dietary Effects on Health (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (92 citations), Cancer Research (74 citations), Hematology (43 citations), Molecular Biology (235 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (18 citations). Ling Ge has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Xiukai Cao, Mengzhi Wang, Juan J. Loor, Jinhui Li, Weibo Zhang, Wei Sun, Lianxin Hu, Lei Zhang, Shanhe Wang and Yun Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, Genes, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Pineal Research and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact