Ling De Young

654 citations
16 papers · 507 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ling De Young

16 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Ling De Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 402
  • Urology 119
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 142
  • Reproductive Medicine 24
  • Clinical Psychology 37
Replace Somboon Leungwattanakij with:
Somboon Leungwattanakij Thailand
Robert B. Moreland United States
Silvia Donati Italy
Lasantha S. Malavige Sri Lanka
E. Waldkirch Germany
Rahul V. Pawar United States
Katherine Esposito Italy
Virginia Zamponi Italy
S Rastogi United States
Stéphanie Caisey France
Ling De Young relative to Somboon Leungwattanakij Thailand Somboon Leungwattanakij's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Somboon Leungwattanakij · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling De Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling De Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling De Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling De Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling De Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling De Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling De Young. The network helps show where Ling De Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Ling De Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling De Young Line = papers co-authored together Ling De Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2004120
2 201162
3 201348
4 200347
5 201146
6 201243
7 201134
8 201230
9 201625
10 200519
11 200713
12 201611
13
Penile traction and Peyronie's disease: in-vitro analysis of the efficacy of traction on cellular changes in Peyronie's plaque in a strain culture system
20123
14 20073
15 20182
16
Protein biomarker analysis of primary Peyronie's disease cells
20111

About Ling De Young

Ling De Young is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Urology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (14 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (1 paper) and Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (402 citations), Urology (119 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (142 citations), Reproductive Medicine (24 citations) and Clinical Psychology (37 citations). Ling De Young has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald Brock, Eric Chung, Ryon M. Bateman, Matthew D. Solomon, Daniel Freeman, Anthony J Bella, Jeffrey Campbell, Jeffrey C. Howard, Abdulla Al‐Ansari and Önder Cangüven. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, The Journal of Urology, International Journal of Impotence Research, Journal of Andrology and Andrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact