Li‐Lian Foo

758 citations
19 papers · 581 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Epidemiology top 10%
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
    • Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

Papers in

    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 6
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 4
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 1
    • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 12
    • Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers 1

Li‐Lian Foo

18 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Li‐Lian Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Ophthalmology 286
  • Epidemiology 232
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 105
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Reproductive Medicine 7
Replace Kengo Uramoto with:
Kengo Uramoto Japan
Tae Igarashi-Yokoi Japan
Sifei Sun China
Peiyao Jin China
Ran Du Japan
Natsuko Saka Japan
Jiao Qi China
Shiqi Xie Japan
Mae Millicent W. Peterseim United States
Li‐Lian Foo relative to Kengo Uramoto Japan Kengo Uramoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Kengo Uramoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Lian Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Lian Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Lian Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Lian Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Lian Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Lian Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Lian Foo. The network helps show where Li‐Lian Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Lian Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Lian Foo Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Lian Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201287
2 201277
3 201163
4 201348
5 202135
6 202235
7 201333
8 201131
9 202231
10 202127
11 202227
12 202119
13 202219
14 202318
15 202116
16 201212
17 20242
18 20251
19 20250

About Li‐Lian Foo

Li‐Lian Foo is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (286 citations), Epidemiology (232 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (105 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (7 citations). Li‐Lian Foo has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Mingguang He, Tin Aung, Monisha Esther Nongpiur, David Steven Friedman, Tien Yin Wong, Shamira Perera, John Carson Allen, Seang‐Mei Saw, Ching‐Yu Cheng and Charumathi Sabanayagam. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics and Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact