Lien-Chen Wu

556 citations
31 papers · 416 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 7
    • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 1
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 6

Lien-Chen Wu

29 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Lien-Chen Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 143
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 52
  • Molecular Medicine 27
  • Pharmaceutical Science 26
  • Surgery 126
Replace Po‐Chih Shen with:
Po‐Chih Shen Taiwan
Chia-Hsien Chen Taiwan
Jingjing Guan China
Isaac L. Moss United States
Shih‐Hsiang Chou Taiwan
Hengrui Chang China
Angus Shane Don New Zealand
Zhencheng Xiong China
Anna R. Tellegen Netherlands
Lien-Chen Wu relative to Po‐Chih Shen Taiwan Po‐Chih Shen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Po‐Chih Shen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lien-Chen Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lien-Chen Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lien-Chen Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lien-Chen Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lien-Chen Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lien-Chen Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lien-Chen Wu. The network helps show where Lien-Chen Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Lien-Chen Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lien-Chen Wu Line = papers co-authored together Lien-Chen Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201865
2 201751
3 202149
4 201743
5 201333
6 201924
7 202022
8 201517
9 201617
10 201413
11 200812
12 201612
13 20098
14 20207
15 20217
16 20156
17 20075
18 20225
19 20224
20 20233

About Lien-Chen Wu

Lien-Chen Wu is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper) and Magnolia and Illicium research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (143 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (52 citations), Molecular Medicine (27 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations) and Surgery (126 citations). Lien-Chen Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chang-Jung Chiang, Chia-Hsien Chen, Yi‐You Huang, Yang‐Hwei Tsuang, Pei-Wei Weng, Yi‐Jie Kuo, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Jui‐Sheng Sun, Shang‐Chih Lin and Ming‐Hong Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Clinical Biomechanics, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact