Libing Guo

1.1k citations
47 papers · 389 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
    • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Neurological Disorders and Treatments

Papers in

Libing Guo

43 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Libing Guo
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Neurology 53
  • Rehabilitation 25
  • Cancer Research 48
  • Epidemiology 76
Replace Hongfang Li with:
Hongfang Li China
Weimin Yang China
Jiaqi Chen China
Yunyang Wang China
Shraddha V. Bhadada India
Shouliang Wang China
Junduo Wu China
Libing Guo relative to Hongfang Li China Hongfang Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hongfang Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libing Guo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libing Guo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libing Guo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libing Guo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libing Guo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libing Guo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libing Guo. The network helps show where Libing Guo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Libing Guo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libing Guo Line = papers co-authored together Libing Guo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201845
2 201829
3 201223
4 201623
5 202119
6 201918
7 201917
8 202116
9 200915
10 201514
11 201914
12 201913
13 200213
14 201612
15 201910
16 200310
17 20239
18 20229
19 20218
20 20158

About Libing Guo

Libing Guo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Epidemiology, Plant Science and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (4 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Neurology (53 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations), Cancer Research (48 citations) and Epidemiology (76 citations). Libing Guo has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tan Xu, Zhong Ju, Xiaoqing Bu, Yonghong Zhang, Jiang He, Jianhui Zhang, Jintao Zhang, Dong Li, Chongke Zhong and Chung-Shiuan Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Chemosphere, Chinese Journal of Chemistry, Journal of the American Heart Association, Molecules and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact