Libby Taylor

407 citations
8 papers · 303 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Libby Taylor

8 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Libby Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 256
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 119
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 70
  • Clinical Psychology 59
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 19
Replace Shigeru Mukaida with:
Shigeru Mukaida Japan
Maria Tsantani United Kingdom
Tony Roberts United Kingdom
Lizann Bonnar United Kingdom
Cédric Laloyaux Belgium
Marie Fabre-Grenet France
Paulami Naik United States
Daniel Elbich United States
Anne Gaule United Kingdom
Rogelio J. Mercado United States
Libby Taylor relative to Shigeru Mukaida Japan Shigeru Mukaida's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Shigeru Mukaida · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Libby Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Libby Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Libby Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Libby Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Libby Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Libby Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Libby Taylor. The network helps show where Libby Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Libby Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Libby Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Libby Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201677
2 201152
3 201351
4 201446
5 201140
6 201419
7 201715
8 20143

About Libby Taylor

Libby Taylor is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Neurology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 8 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper), Face recognition and analysis (1 paper) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (256 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (119 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (70 citations), Clinical Psychology (59 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (19 citations). Libby Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Rhodes, Linda Jeffery, Louise Ewing, William G. Hayward, Marianne Peters, Davide Rivolta, Roberta Daini, Romina Palermo, Elinor McKone and Andrea Albonico. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, British Journal of Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact