Liat Ein‐Dor

2.7k citations
31 papers · 1.9k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Liat Ein‐Dor

30 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Liat Ein‐Dor
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Cancer Research 308
  • Molecular Biology 901
  • Artificial Intelligence 357
  • Hematology 90
  • Statistics and Probability 72
Replace Xun Zhu with:
Xun Zhu United States
Lorraine K Tanabe United States
Chen‐Hsiang Yeang Taiwan
Kim Last United Kingdom
Vlad Calin Popovici Switzerland
Pierre Gestraud France
Suleiman A. Khan Finland
Éva Latulippe Canada
Yvonne Kahlert Germany
Fathi Elloumi United States
Liat Ein‐Dor relative to Xun Zhu United States Xun Zhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Xun Zhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Ein‐Dor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Ein‐Dor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Ein‐Dor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Ein‐Dor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Ein‐Dor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Ein‐Dor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Ein‐Dor. The network helps show where Liat Ein‐Dor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liat Ein‐Dor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liat Ein‐Dor Line = papers co-authored together Liat Ein‐Dor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004627
2 2006545
3 2006129
4 2005123
5 2020116
6 2021110
7 201468
8 202238
9 202032
10 200527
11 200117
12 201915
13 202313
14 200112
15 199910
16 20019
17 20029
18 20079
19 20229
20 19986

About Liat Ein‐Dor

Liat Ein‐Dor is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Cancer Research, Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (3 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (3 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (3 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (3 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (308 citations), Molecular Biology (901 citations), Artificial Intelligence (357 citations), Hematology (90 citations) and Statistics and Probability (72 citations). Liat Ein‐Dor has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eytan Domany, Or Zuk, David Givol, Gad A. Getz, Itai Kela, Noam Slonim, Ido Kanter, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon and Ilan Tsafrir. Their work appears in journals such as Europhysics Letters (EPL), Nature, Breast Cancer Research, Computer applications in the biosciences and IBM Journal of Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact