L.F.G. Williams

453 citations
32 papers · 393 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

L.F.G. Williams

32 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

L.F.G. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Metals and Alloys 70
  • Electrochemistry 43
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 103
  • Bioengineering 26
  • Inorganic Chemistry 56
Replace W. H. Slabaugh with:
W. H. Slabaugh United States
S. Hettiarachchi United States
N.‐G. Vannerberg Sweden
V. Otieno‐Alego Australia
Yuanyuan Qian China
K. Kvastek Croatia
N. P. Andreeva Russia
Markus Lampimäki Finland
Elizabeth A. Kulp United States
Sébastien Picart France
L.F.G. Williams relative to W. H. Slabaugh United States W. H. Slabaugh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
W. H. Slabaugh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.F.G. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.F.G. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.F.G. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.F.G. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.F.G. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.F.G. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.F.G. Williams. The network helps show where L.F.G. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside L.F.G. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.F.G. Williams Line = papers co-authored together L.F.G. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197753
2 196438
3 196429
4 201127
5 201024
6 198022
7 196420
8 198218
9 197718
10 197717
11 198416
12 197314
13 19799
14 19769
15 19808
16 19728
17 19808
18 19767
19 19726
20 19805

About L.F.G. Williams

L.F.G. Williams is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrochemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (14 papers), Concrete Corrosion and Durability (13 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (5 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (3 papers), Marine and fisheries research (2 papers) and Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (70 citations), Electrochemistry (43 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (103 citations), Bioengineering (26 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (56 citations). L.F.G. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. G. Hayter, Kevin G. Boto, R. J. Taylor, Charles A. Gray, Chris T. Walsh, A.A. Humffray, Dylan E. van der Meulen, Roger J. O'Halloran, Larisa R.G. DeSantis and John M. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Corrosion Science, Electrochimica Acta, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, CORROSION and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact