Lev Shchur

89 papers receiving 870 citations

Peers

Lev Shchur
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Condensed Matter Physics 428
  • Mathematical Physics 244
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 303
  • Statistics and Probability 63
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 81
Replace Emmanuel Guitter with:
Emmanuel Guitter France
Vladimir Dotsenko Russia
D.A. Johnston United Kingdom
Carl P. Dettmann United Kingdom
Nicolas Sourlas France
Martin Weigel Germany
Frédéric Hélein France
Marcin Magdziarz Poland
Aurélien Decelle France
C. Boldrighini Italy
Lev Shchur relative to Emmanuel Guitter France Emmanuel Guitter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Emmanuel Guitter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lev Shchur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lev Shchur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lev Shchur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lev Shchur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lev Shchur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lev Shchur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lev Shchur. The network helps show where Lev Shchur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lev Shchur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lev Shchur Line = papers co-authored together Lev Shchur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985101
2 200983
3
THE CLUSTER PROCESSOR: NEW RESULTS
199943
4 201742
5 200540
6 200938
7 199833
8 199731
9 201424
10 202122
11 200622
12 199419
13 199919
14
Cluster-flipping Monte Carlo algorithm and correlations in good' random number generators
199317
15 200116
16 200615
17 201014
18 200413
19 200813
20 200013

About Lev Shchur

Lev Shchur is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 97 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (49 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (26 papers), Quantum many-body systems (15 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (15 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (10 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (7 papers) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (428 citations), Mathematical Physics (244 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (303 citations), Statistics and Probability (63 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (81 citations). Lev Shchur has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lev Barash, W. Selke, A. L. Talapov, Henk W. J. Blöte, Wolfhard Janke, Konstantin Khanin, Oleg A. Vasilyev, I. M. Khalatnikov, V. M. Vinokur and E.M. LIFSHITZ. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Physics Communications, Physical review. E, International Journal of Modern Physics C, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and Nuclear Physics B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact