Leslie Vanderburgh

657 citations
11 papers · 469 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Leslie Vanderburgh

11 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Leslie Vanderburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 307
  • Reproductive Medicine 130
  • Emergency Medical Services 64
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 91
  • Nephrology 32
Replace S. Kovács with:
S. Kovács United States
Sanae Imoto Japan
C. d’Ercole France
Karrie E. Francois United States
Paul Reuwer Netherlands
Mauricio Monroy‐Cuadros Canada
Holli Roach United States
JAF Huirne Netherlands
Patrick Schurando France
Dahlia Admon Israel
Leslie Vanderburgh relative to S. Kovács United States S. Kovács's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
S. Kovács · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Vanderburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Vanderburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Vanderburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Vanderburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Vanderburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Vanderburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Vanderburgh. The network helps show where Leslie Vanderburgh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Leslie Vanderburgh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leslie Vanderburgh Line = papers co-authored together Leslie Vanderburgh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005222
2 200392
3 200357
4 199834
5 199927
6 199716
7
Complications of radiologically placed central venous ports and Hickman catheters in patients with AIDS.
19988
8 19967
9 19964
10 20031
11
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two film-screen systems for chest radiography.
19961

About Leslie Vanderburgh

Leslie Vanderburgh is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Emergency Medical Services, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (1 paper), Tracheal and airway disorders (1 paper), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (1 paper) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (307 citations), Reproductive Medicine (130 citations), Emergency Medical Services (64 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (91 citations) and Nephrology (32 citations). Leslie Vanderburgh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gaylene Pron, John Bennett, Andrew Common, George A. Vilos, Eva Mocarski, Stuart D. Bell, Greg Garvin, Marsha M. Cohen, Kenneth W. Sniderman and Martin E. Simons. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Annals of Vascular Surgery, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact