Leonid Zhmud

904 citations
27 papers · 358 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 19
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 6
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 8

Leonid Zhmud

20 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Leonid Zhmud
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Anthropology 225
  • Theoretical Computer Science 28
  • Philosophy 247
  • Archeology 183
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
Replace Leonardo Tarán with:
Leonardo Tarán United States
James H. Lesher United States
Holger Thesleff Finland
Luc Brisson France
Sylvia Berryman Canada
Riccardo Chiaradonna Italy
Verity Harte United States
Péter Lautner Hungary
Tiziano Dorandi France
Richard McKirahan United States
Leonid Zhmud relative to Leonardo Tarán United States Leonardo Tarán's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Leonardo Tarán · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonid Zhmud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonid Zhmud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonid Zhmud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonid Zhmud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonid Zhmud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonid Zhmud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonid Zhmud. The network helps show where Leonid Zhmud may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Leonid Zhmud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonid Zhmud Line = papers co-authored together Leonid Zhmud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012110
2 200648
3 199746
4 199832
5 201421
6 201618
7 200314
8 201814
9 198912
10 20188
11 20177
12 20017
13 20183
14 19893
15 20133
16 20172
17 20032
18 20162
19 20011
20
Orphism and Grafitti from Olbia
19921

About Leonid Zhmud

Leonid Zhmud is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, Theoretical Computer Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (225 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (28 citations), Philosophy (247 citations), Archeology (183 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations). Leonid Zhmud has collaborated with scholars based in Russia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Windle and Han Baltussen. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Phronesis, Philologus, Hermes and Isis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact