Leonard Schatzman
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Public Administration top 5%
Papers in
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 5
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 4
- Co-authors
- Anselm Strauss (7 shared papers)Jack Preiss (1 shared paper)Anselm L. Strauss (2 shared papers)Rue Bucher (5 shared papers)Danuta Ehrlich (2 shared papers)Melvin Sabshin (2 shared papers)Eliot Freidson (1 shared paper)Daniel Offer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Social Problems (6 papers)American Sociological Review (1 paper)Nursing Research (1 paper)Social Forces (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Leonard Schatzman
18 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Leonard Schatzman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Research and Theory 29
- Public Administration 74
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 20
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 172
- General Health Professions 383
Countries citing papers authored by Leonard Schatzman
This map shows the geographic impact of Leonard Schatzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonard Schatzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonard Schatzman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leonard Schatzman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonard Schatzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonard Schatzman. The network helps show where Leonard Schatzman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Leonard Schatzman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Hit paper breakdown → | 1974 | 672 |
| 2 | Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Hit paper breakdown → | 1974 | 397 |
| 3 | 1965 | 333 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 270 | |
| 5 | 1955 | 85 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1961 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1955 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1966 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1962 | 0 |
About Leonard Schatzman
Leonard Schatzman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper), Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (29 citations), Public Administration (74 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (20 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (172 citations) and General Health Professions (383 citations). Leonard Schatzman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anselm Strauss, Jack Preiss, Anselm L. Strauss, Rue Bucher, Danuta Ehrlich, Melvin Sabshin, Eliot Freidson, Daniel Offer, Arnold Goldberg and Diane C. Hatton. Their work appears in journals such as Social Problems, American Sociological Review, Nursing Research, Social Forces and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.