Leona Fields

513 citations
13 papers · 445 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control 3
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 3
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 2

Leona Fields

13 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Leona Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Transplantation 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 117
  • Analytical Chemistry 42
  • Physiology 91
  • Pharmacology 23
Replace Naoki Haruyama with:
Naoki Haruyama Japan
Taku NAGAO Japan
Peter Adlard United Kingdom
João Batista Gadelha de Cerqueira Brazil
Yuji Uchizono Japan
Eugen Schlegel Germany
S C Boyages Australia
Cinzia Martini Italy
Walter E. Mueller Germany
Peter Dommes Germany
Leona Fields relative to Naoki Haruyama Japan Naoki Haruyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23×
Naoki Haruyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leona Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leona Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leona Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leona Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leona Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leona Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leona Fields. The network helps show where Leona Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leona Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leona Fields Line = papers co-authored together Leona Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2003135
2 201588
3 201864
4 198257
5 200226
6 200926
7 201617
8 198510
9
Adjustment of cyclosporine dosage in renal transplant patients based on concentration measured specifically in whole blood: clinical outcome results and diagnostic utility.
19909
10 19845
11 19935
12 20172
13 20151

About Leona Fields

Leona Fields is a scholar working on Physiology, Transplantation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Analytical Chemistry and Statistics and Probability, having authored 13 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (64 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (117 citations), Analytical Chemistry (42 citations), Physiology (91 citations) and Pharmacology (23 citations). Leona Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Leslie M. Shaw, Magdalena Korecka, Robert L. Mayock, Mirosław Majewski, W. Schüler, Joanne Joergensen, Mariusz A. Wasik, Plamen M. Kossev, Teresa Waligórska and Michal Figurski. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Clinical Chemistry, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact