Leon Pompa

701 citations
23 papers · 440 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Leon Pompa

14 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Leon Pompa
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • History and Philosophy of Science 75
  • Philosophy 136
  • General Psychology 12
  • Political Science and International Relations 130
  • History 51
Replace Maurice Cranston with:
Maurice Cranston United Kingdom
Louis O. Mink United States
Fritzie P. Manuel
Alfred J. Bingham France
Jacques Maritain United States
Robert E. Norton Australia
Joseph W. Bendersky United States
James Engell United States
Alan Charles Kors United States
Alexander Broadie United Kingdom
Leon Pompa relative to Maurice Cranston United Kingdom Maurice Cranston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Maurice Cranston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leon Pompa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leon Pompa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leon Pompa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leon Pompa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leon Pompa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leon Pompa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leon Pompa. The network helps show where Leon Pompa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Leon Pompa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leon Pompa Line = papers co-authored together Leon Pompa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991217
2 197350
3 199049
4 197327
5 198624
6 200223
7 198317
8
Vico : A Study of the 'New Science'
197514
9 19715
10 19853
11 19913
12 19812
13 19762
14
La función del legislador en Giambattista Vico
19951
15 19841
16 19751
17 19901
18 19970
19 19920
20
La scienza di Vico
19720

About Leon Pompa

Leon Pompa is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History, having authored 23 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Giambattista Vico and Joyce (12 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (1 paper), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Political theory and Gramsci (1 paper), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (75 citations), Philosophy (136 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Political Science and International Relations (130 citations) and History (51 citations). Leon Pompa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry Hardy, Isaiah Berlín, Eugenio Garin, Edmund Leach, William H. Dray, Donald W. Livingston, Nicholas Rescher, Leon J. Goldstein and Hayden V. White. Their work appears in journals such as Inquiry, History and Theory, The Philosophical Quarterly, The Modern Language Review and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact