Leo E. LaChance

1.3k citations
67 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Leo E. LaChance

65 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

Leo E. LaChance
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Insect Science 713
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 244
  • Genetics 253
  • Plant Science 224
  • Molecular Biology 377
Replace Winifred W. Doane with:
Winifred W. Doane United States
Yasuhiro Horie China
Rakesh Kumar Seth India
R Dixit India
Giorgio Prantera Italy
Dorothy A. Schlaeger United States
Xiangfeng Jing China
Deborah Keiko Hoshizaki United States
Yundan Wang China
King Rc United States
Leo E. LaChance relative to Winifred W. Doane United States Winifred W. Doane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Winifred W. Doane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo E. LaChance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo E. LaChance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo E. LaChance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo E. LaChance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo E. LaChance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo E. LaChance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo E. LaChance. The network helps show where Leo E. LaChance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo E. LaChance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo E. LaChance Line = papers co-authored together Leo E. LaChance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975109
2 197583
3 198264
4 198560
5 198447
6 196442
7 197741
8 197039
9 196334
10 197434
11 198229
12 198625
13 197523
14 196223
15 196321
16 196621
17 196921
18 197319
19 196218
20 197517

About Leo E. LaChance

Leo E. LaChance is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (32 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (27 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (713 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (244 citations), Genetics (253 citations), Plant Science (224 citations) and Molecular Biology (377 citations). Leo E. LaChance has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fredrick I. Proshold, Maurice E. Degrugillier, John G. Riemann, Chandler J. Whitten, Maxwell M. Crystal, Juan D. López, Jerome Anthony Klun, Barbara A. Leonhardt, Delphine Dufour and Mélanie Tremblay. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Economic Entomology, Environmental Entomology, Science and Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact